Skip to main content
· 8/29/2000

Belmonte v. Employers Insurance

Citations

  • 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 661
  • 83 Cal. App. 4th 430
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7279
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9613
  • 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that insured’s act of permitting access to key was conduct separate only in fact that it preceded collision; it cannot be disassociated from the use of the vehicle itself
  • finding no coverage for negligent supervision where the child’s injurious use of a van constituted the single proximate cause of the injuries
  • finding no coverage for negligent supervision where the child’s injurious use of a van constituted the single proximate cause of the injuries
  • vehicle exclusion precluded coverage where van negligently driven by insured’s niece hit and injured the victim, even though insured was allegedly negligent in allowing his niece to obtain the key
  • vehicle exclusion precluded coverage where van negligently driven by insured's niece hit and injured the victim, even though insured was allegedly negligent in allowing his niece to obtain the key
  • auto exclusion in commercial general 23 liability policy barred premises liability claims for negligent use of insured’s premises where niece stole 24 van of insured who owned and operated a store and injured friend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rylaarsdam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.