· 8/29/2000
Belmonte v. Employers Insurance
Citations
- 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 661
- 83 Cal. App. 4th 430
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7279
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9613
- 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 684
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that insured’s act of permitting access to key was conduct separate only in fact that it preceded collision; it cannot be disassociated from the use of the vehicle itself
- finding no coverage for negligent supervision where the child’s injurious use of a van constituted the single proximate cause of the injuries
- finding no coverage for negligent supervision where the child’s injurious use of a van constituted the single proximate cause of the injuries
- vehicle exclusion precluded coverage where van negligently driven by insured’s niece hit and injured the victim, even though insured was allegedly negligent in allowing his niece to obtain the key
- vehicle exclusion precluded coverage where van negligently driven by insured's niece hit and injured the victim, even though insured was allegedly negligent in allowing his niece to obtain the key
- auto exclusion in commercial general 23 liability policy barred premises liability claims for negligent use of insured’s premises where niece stole 24 van of insured who owned and operated a store and injured friend
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rylaarsdam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.