Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[ejconomic losses alone do not justify a preliminary injunction”
• affirming preliminary injunction in part because the record contained evidence of plaintiff’s specific losses—the loss of 3200 customers per week—pending final resolution
• discerning no abuse of discretion where a district court declined to set a bond amount at the time it entered a preliminary injunction but instead ordered the parties to confer “regarding the ‘bond issue’”
• “The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Bell- South had established a substantial likelihood of success.”
• “The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Bell- South had established a substantial likelihood of success.”
• “The district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that BellSouth had established a substantial likelihood of success.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).