BellSouth Mobility, Inc. v. Cellulink, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff must establish “the absence of the defendant’s involvement in the business relationship” as an element of its tortious-interference claim
• holding that where a contract would not have been consummated without the participation of a certain party, that party is “anything but a stranger to the relationship”
• representation that company was “committed to its agents” constituted “puf-fery” and was no statement of material fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).