Bellingham Frozen Foods, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the statements of the new employer's president supported the NLRB's conclusion \that it was `perfectly clear' that [the employer] intended to staff the plant with a sufficient number of [predecessor] employees to trigger a bargaining obligation\ (emphasis added)
• relying on the successor employer’s statement that it would “employ all but ‘some’ of the [predecessor’s] employees” (emphasis added)
• successor employer’s duty to bargain commences once it is clear that he intends to hire a majority of his work force from the ranks of his predecessor’s employees
• court refused to enforce reinstatement order against successor employer where that order was an order tied to the continuance of the bargaining agent in the unit because the successor employer had hired all new employees in that bargaining unit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).