Bellevue School Dist. v. Es

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it remains undetermined whether the Lassiter decision by the United States Supreme Court has eroded the constitutional underpinnings of this court’s decision in Luscier,” but nonetheless assuming its continued viability
• little risk of erroneous deprivation of child' s rights by absence of counsel at initial truancy hearing
• where statute made counsel for juvenile at initial truancy hearing discretionary, juvenile's claim that article I, section 3 offered broader protection than federal counterpart and required appointment ofcounsel would require court to hold statute is unconstitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).