Bellamy v. Resolution Trust Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Neither fraud in the inducement nor knowledge by the [lender] is relevant to application of [the D’Oench Duhme doctrine], although fraud in the factum [precluding the borrower from knowing the terms of the loan] would be.”
• “Neither fraud in the inducement nor knowledge by the [lender] is relevant to application of [the D’Oench Duhme doctrine], although fraud in the factum [precluding the borrower from knowing the terms of the loan] would be.”
• “[Although we do not generally condone the grant of summary judgment while a motion to compel discovery is pending, reversal is not required because the requested discovery could not have added anything of substance to the [appellants’] claims. [Cit.]”
• general test for fraud in the factum
• general test for fraud in the factum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).