Bellamy v. McMickens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “restrictions on inmates’ access to counsel via the telephone may be permitted as long as prisoners have some manner of access to counsel”
• explaining that “states have no obligation to provide the best manner of access to counsel” and “restrictions on inmates’ access to counsel via the telephone may be permitted as long as prisoners have some manner of access to counsel”
• explaining that “states have no obligation to provide the best manner of access to counsel” and “restrictions on inmates’ access to counsel via the telephone may be permitted as long as prisoners have some manner of access to counsel”
• explaining that “states have no obligation to provide the best manner of access to counsel” and “restrictions on inmates’ access to counsel via the telephone may be permitted as long as prisoners have some manner of access to counsel”
• granting summary judgment where defendants submitted “voluminous medical records” indicating that “plaintiff’s condition was closely monitored”
• inmates have no right to unlimited telephone calls and there is no obligation to provide the “best manner of access to counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).