Bellamy v. F. A. Ames Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under Delaware law, “[t]he same inquiry governs a veil-piercing claim for a limited liability company” as for a corporation
• reasoning that a plaintiff “adequately alleged 2 justifiable reliance on fraudulent representations” when relying on statements made by the 3 defendant’s CEO about the defendant’s own financial condition
• explaining that the issue of whether defendants owed plaintiff a fiduciary duty was related to the internal affairs of the limited liability company, which, under Indiana’s choice-of-law rules, was governed by the law of the state of incorporation
• explaining that the issue of whether defendants owed plaintiff a fiduciary duty was related to the internal affairs of the limited liability company, which, under Indiana’s choice-of-law rules, was governed by. the law of the state of incorporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).