Bellamy v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting claim asserting portion of vocational expert’s testimony was erased from hearing transcript because the claimant failed to provide a sworn statement, or any other verification, that the vocational expert testified as the claimant alleged
• when alternative bases for finding a claimant not disabled exist, error with regard to one of those bases is harmless
• “[T]he role of this [c]ourt is not to decide the facts anew, nor to reweigh the facts, nor to substitute its judgment for the judgment of the ALJ.”
• “To the extent that we find substantial evidence to support the ALJ’s finding at the previous step in the sequential evaluation process that plaintiff could perform her past relevant work as a telemarketer, any error at Step Five would constitute harmless error.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).