Skip to main content
· 6/20/1961

Bellah v. Patterson

Citations

  • 197 F. Supp. 522
  • 9 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 384
  • 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5690

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding where requesting party did not specify it wanted metadata as part of document production, responding party would not be compelled to supply it
  • “ADC did not specify a form for the production of the document at issue, so Autotech had the option of producing it in the form in which it was ordinarily maintained, or in a reasonably usable form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.