Bell v. Zurich American Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court that had two alternative ratings from which to choose properly reversed Division’s impairment rating because Division’s rating was decided using Advisories, as compared to alternative impairment rating that did not use the Advisories as guidance
• “In other words, the requirement that the impairment rating match one of the physicians’ findings is part of the substantive statutory scheme.”
• “the requirement that the impairment rating match one of the physicians’ findings is part of the substantive statutory scheme.”
• labor code does not permit reconsideration or reopening of evidence of claimant’s impairment rating

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).