Bell v. Ward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding mailbox rule applied to appeal placed in mail within 30-day period but received by ARB outside the time to appeal
• stating “[a]nd though the defendants would like us to presume that [Section] 504.850 and the ARB’s own procedures do not recognize the ‘mailbox rule,’ they offered no support (and still don't) for the proposition.”
• “It is not deliberate indifference for prison medical professionals to insist that a prisoner pay the required co-payment before receiving care when he has the ability to pay.”
• “It is not deliberate indifference for prison medical professionals to insist that a prisoner pay the required co-payment before receiving care when he has the ability to pay.”
• “And though the defendants would like us to presume that [Section] 504.850 and the ARB’s own procedures do not recognize the ‘mailbox rule,’ they offered no support (and still don’t) for the proposition.”
• “And though the defendants would like us to presume that [Section] 504.850 and the ARB's own procedures do not recognize the ‘mailbox rule,’ they offered no support (and still don't) for the proposition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).