Bell v. VPSI, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that requiring a worker to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and safety requirements does not show a right of control over the details of how a worker performs his or her job
• holding that requiring a worker to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and safety requirements does not show a right of control over the details of how a worker performs his or her job
• holding that requiring a worker to comply with applicable laws, regulations, and safety requirements does not show a right of control over the details of how a worker performs his or her job
• “Once the presumption is rebutted, ownership of the vehicle by the employer and employment of the driver are insufficient to raise the issue of course and scope of employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).