Skip to main content
· 7/17/1996

Bell v. Vecellio & Grogan, Inc.

Citations

  • 475 S.E.2d 138
  • 197 W. Va. 138
  • 1996 W. Va. LEXIS 133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that fraudulent conduct fell under the judicially adopted “bad faith” exception to the rule
  • reversing summary judgment holding that plaintiff was not covered by statute because injury occurred while he was working outside the state
  • the fact that an accident occurred in Maryland was not dispositive on whether a “deliberate intention” suit would be permitted
  • employee with a West Virginia employment relationship who was injured while assigned to work in Maryland could maintain a deliberate intent action under West Virginia law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Recht

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.