Bell v. Tryon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court abused its discretion in exclud- ing evidence on summary judgment without providing the parties with “the opportunity respectively to lay a foundation for the admission of the survey or to challenge the adequacy of the foundation”
• considering (1) the public’s 19 interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the 20 risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their 21 merits; and (5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).