· 12/2/1983
Bell v. Tilton
Citations
- 674 P.2d 468
- 234 Kan. 461
- 1983 Kan. LEXIS 432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no duty to indemnify where one could infer intent to injure from insured’s intent to hit playmate with pellet from BB gun
- an insurance policy barred coverage when a playmate fired a BB gun at a friend and ended up shooting him in the eye
- “The mere fact an insurance company retains an attorney to represent an insured against a lawsuit does not mean the attorney is also the insurance company’s attorney capable of binding the insurance company.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.