Skip to main content
· 12/2/1983

Bell v. Tilton

Citations

  • 674 P.2d 468
  • 234 Kan. 461
  • 1983 Kan. LEXIS 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no duty to indemnify where one could infer intent to injure from insured’s intent to hit playmate with pellet from BB gun
  • an insurance policy barred coverage when a playmate fired a BB gun at a friend and ended up shooting him in the eye
  • “The mere fact an insurance company retains an attorney to represent an insured against a lawsuit does not mean the attorney is also the insurance company’s attorney capable of binding the insurance company.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.