Skip to main content

Bell v. State

Citations

  • 620 S.W.2d 116
  • 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding not calling attention to any portion of the record from which to identify the action claimed of presents nothing for review
  • reasoning that misdemeanor marijuana possession does not involve moral turpitude
  • defense counsel opened the door by asking accused, \Have you anything in your past of a criminal nature?\; prosecution entitled to impeach using specific instances of conduct
  • “Mere arrests or charges of offenses are generally inadmissible for impeachment purposes.”
  • misdemeanor possession of marihuana does not involve moral turpitude
  • misdemeanor marijuana possession does not involve moral turpitude

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Roberts, Odom, Clinton, Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.