Bell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “[g]enerally, the statute to be applied when arriving at the proper criminal penalty should be the one in effect at the time the crime was committed.”
• “Under the new version, the court has far greater flexibility in imposing habitual offender enhancements.”
• “Generally, the statute to be applied when arriving at the proper criminal penalty should be the one in effect at the time the crime was committed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Townsend v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-08-20· cited 22×
• Scott Grundy v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-06-30· cited 10×
• DeSantis v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-12-21· cited 8×
• Turner v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-08-03· cited 8×
• Turner v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1996-08-08· cited 6×
• State v. Hammond
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-10-23· cited 5×
• Fatima Mays v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-02-12
• Michael Koetter v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-11-19
• Harry C. Hobbs v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-12-23

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Floyd v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1994-12-30· cited 64×
• Lewandowski v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-05-17· cited 47×
• Dowdell v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1975-11-05· cited 27×
• Parsley v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-03-31· cited 26×
• Lunsford v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-09-01· cited 24×
• Patterson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-12-27· cited 16×