Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/2/1964
Bell v. State
Citations
- 198 A.2d 895
- 234 Md. 254
- 1964 Md. LEXIS 613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the case of confessions it is the general rule that the whole of a confession must be admitted. Neither side can select the incriminatory or exculpatory portions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Hammond, Prescott, Horney and Sybert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bradford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-05-04· cited 53×
- Wethington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-02-23· cited 36×
- Fowler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-11· cited 35×
- Gorski v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-04-21· cited 31×
- State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals· 1979-05-29· cited 15×
- Churchfield v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-02· cited 13×
- State v. MiltonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1974-08-21· cited 10×
- Offutt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-07-07· cited 7×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-10-16· cited 52×
- Kiefer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1960-11-01· cited 32×
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-10-13· cited 28×
- Mazer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1963-03-04· cited 17×
- Schneider v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 1949-10-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.