Bell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In considering the motion [to dismiss], ‘the State is entitled to the most favorable construction of the evidence, and all inferences should be resolved against the defendant.’” (quoting State v. Pasko, 815 So. 2d 680, 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Walthour
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-04· cited 28×
• State v. Holland
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-05· cited 8×
• State v. Yarn
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-20· cited 8×
• Sexton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-07· cited 8×
• State v. Jaramillo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-14· cited 7×
• State v. James
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-26· cited 5×
• Dante Martin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-18· cited 5×
• State v. Bennett
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-04-17· cited 5×
• State v. Espinoza
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-01-30· cited 5×
• State v. Massey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-14· cited 4×
• Gresham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-20· cited 2×
• State v. Trappen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-30· cited 1×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. JOEL DAVID FAY, JR.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-09-06
• State v. Moore
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-15
• Janet Roster v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-04-24

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Jennings
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-10-19· cited 36×
• State v. Pasko
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-03· cited 29×