Bell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant urged portion of indictment alleging prior conviction should be struck because it did not sufficiently inform him of charged offense; judgment could have been reformed and was not void
• defendant urged portion of indictment alleging prior conviction should be struck because it did not sufficiently inform him of charged offense; judgment could have been reformed and was not void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ames v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-07-17· cited 31×
• Porter v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1988-09-14· cited 21×
• Carberry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-12-18· cited 4×
• McNabb v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-01-21· cited 1×
• Carberry v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-12-12· cited 1×
• Jimmie Gene Hindman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-05-03
• Hodge v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-12-23

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smothermon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-11-18· cited 24×
• Whitlock v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-06-25· cited 21×