Skip to main content

Bell v. State

Citations

  • 90 S.W.3d 301
  • 2002 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 215
  • 2002 WL 31466807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that convicting court must order DNA testing only if the statutory conditions are met
  • holding that identity was not at issue when appellant confessed to the charged offense but did not also plead guilty
  • holding that evidence of another person's DNA at the crime scene will not, without 'more, constitute affirmative evidence of a defendant's innocence
  • holding that convicting court must order DNA testing only if the statutory conditions are met
  • holding that convicting court must order DNA testing only if the statutory conditions are met
  • holding that identity was not at issue when appellant confessed to the charged offense but did not also plead guilty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Keller, Meyers, Price, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

273 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.