Bell v. PNC Bank, National Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prospective class had presented a common issue of fact when it “offered evidence” of “a broader company policy”
• holding that a prospective class had presented a common issue of fact when it “offered evidence” of “a broader company policy”
• noting that a court may receive evidence by affidavit to resolve factual issues pertaining to class certification issues
• stating that Rule 23(b)(3) “does not require a plaintiff seeking class certification to prove that each element of her claim is susceptible to class- wide proof”
• stating that Rule 23(b)(3) “does not require a plaintiff seeking class certification to prove that each element of her claim is susceptible to class- wide proof”
• explaining that the remaining individual claim “would be one by individual Employee A alleging that her manager, Manager B, forced her to work off-the-clock without pay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).