Skip to main content
· 2/16/2012

Bell v. PLIVA, Inc.

Citations

  • 845 F. Supp. 2d 967
  • 2012 WL 640742
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[f]ormal discovery requests clearly fall within” the scope of the “motion, order or other paper” requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.