Bell v. Perry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “general and conclusory allegation” of a municipal policy or custom fails to state a Monell claim
• holding that a Title VII plaintiff “need only” plead enough facts to “give plausible support to a minimal inference of discriminatory motivation”
• holding that a plaintiff must plead facts sufficient to plausibly support each element of prima facie case
• holding that “negative statements, “harsh tones,” being excluded from conversations and meetings, and increased workloads did not constitute hostile work environ- ments
• holding that to state a Title VII claim, the plaintiff need only satisfy the “minimal burden of showing facts suggesting an inference of discriminatory motivation”
• holding that a “general and conclusory allegation” of a municipal policy or custom fails to state a Monell claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).