Skip to main content
· 7/30/1898

Bell v. Murff

Citations

  • 50 La. Ann. 998
  • 23 So. 965
  • 1898 La. LEXIS 327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “if the corporation is still under the control of those who must be defendants in the suit,” the demand requirement is excused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.