· 7/30/1898
Bell v. Murff
Citations
- 50 La. Ann. 998
- 23 So. 965
- 1898 La. LEXIS 327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “if the corporation is still under the control of those who must be defendants in the suit,” the demand requirement is excused
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.