Bell v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the State amended the charging information five days prior to trial to add a second potential prior lawful act
• evidence insufficient to support conviction for intimidation where defendant threatened victim with the intent that victim not come onto his property, which is not a prior act
• evidence insufficient to prove intent to retaliate for “arguing”
• evidence insufficient to prove intent to retaliate for “arguing”
• evidence insufficient to prove intent to retaliate for “arguing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).