Bell v. Louisville Board of Fire Underwriters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff met the public- interest requirement because “[t]he public interest has been authoritatively declared by Congress in its enactment of the [Fair Housing Act]” (internal citation marks omitted)
• “Irreparable injury is that which is substantial and not compensable by monetary damages or other legal remedies.”
• plaintiff met the public interest requirement for preliminary injunction where she established discrimination on the basis of disability because the \public interest has been authoritatively declared by Congress\ in its enactment of the FHA
• upon a showing of likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm, finding that plaintiff met the public interest requirement because “[t]he public interest has been'-authoritatively declared by Congress in its enactment of the FHA”
• upon a showing of 18 likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm, finding that plaintiff met the 19 public interest requirement because “[t]he public interest has been authoritatively 20 declared by Congress in its enactment of the FHA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).