Bell v. King, Phipps & Associates, P. C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence of a decline in property value over the relevant period of time is insufficient without evidence that the value of the property was affected by the allegedly slanderous lien
• “The expenses of defending a lawsuit do not constitute special damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haisfield v. ACP Florida Holdings, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-22· cited 14×
• South River Farms v. Bearden
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-09-01· cited 7×
• VEATCH v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC Et Al.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-04-10· cited 3×
• Decorating Direct, Inc. v. Crawford (In Re Decorating Direct, Inc.)
  N.D. Georgia· 1996-02-02· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pugh v. Frank Jackson Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-02-01· cited 12×
• Gardner v. West-Col, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1978-09-11· cited 11×
• Pair v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-02-23· cited 10×
• Aiken v. Citizens & Southern Bank
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-06-02· cited 10×
• Taylor v. Greiner
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1981-04-15· cited 9×
• South Georgia Building & Investment Co. v. Mathews
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1908-05-07· cited 3×
• Horner v. Savannah Valley Enterprises, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-02-18· cited 2×