Skip to main content
· 2/13/2008

Bell v. Kater

Citations

  • 943 A.2d 293
  • 2008 Pa. Super. 18
  • 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 90
  • 2008 WL 376053

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s “argument that she can raise the defense of immunity in a petition to strike three years after verdict because it is a non-waivable jurisdictional defense must fail”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klein, Gantman, McEwen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.