Skip to main content
· 2/25/1994

Bell v. K Mart Corp.

Citations

  • 848 F. Supp. 996
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4753
  • 64 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,038
  • 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 335

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is well established that ‘the fact that counsel may be inconvenienced is [almost] irrelevant to whether the motion for transfer should be granted.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Prather v. Raymond Constr. Co., 570 F. Supp. 278, 284 (N.D. Ga. 1983))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carl H. Hodges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.