Bell v. K Mart Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well established that ‘the fact that counsel may be inconvenienced is [almost] irrelevant to whether the motion for transfer should be granted.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Prather v. Raymond Constr. Co., 570 F. Supp. 278, 284 (N.D. Ga. 1983))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bannister v. Wal-Mart Stores East
  E.D. North Carolina· 2012-02-14· cited 23×
• Moore v. McKibbon Bros., Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 1998-12-01· cited 14×
• Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP v. City of Tulsa
  N.D. Georgia· 2002-09-03· cited 12×
• Sarvint Technologies, Inc. v. OMsignal, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 2015-06-02· cited 11×
• Southern Appalachian Biodiversity Project v. U.S. Forest Service
  N.D. Georgia· 2001-06-22· cited 1×
• SOUTHERN APPALACH. BIODIVERS. v. US Forest Serv.
  N.D. Georgia· 2001-06-22

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert
  Supreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 5,292×
• Norwood v. Kirkpatrick
  Supreme Court· 1955-04-11· cited 752×
• Hagelthorn v. Kennecott Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1983-06-14· cited 115×
• Grey v. Continental Marketing Associates, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 1970-06-22· cited 32×
• DeLay & Daniels, Inc. v. Allen M. Campbell Co.
  D. South Carolina· 1976-05-12· cited 10×
• In re Gerry
  N.D. California· 1987-09-25· cited 5×