Skip to main content
· 5/19/2011

Bell v. Hutsell

Citations

  • 2011 IL 110724
  • 955 N.E.2d 1099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Illinois courts look to the Restatement (Second) of Torts to define the theory
  • “Unless a duty is owed, there can be no recovery in tort for negligence.”
  • “Unless a duty is owed, there can be no recovery in tort for negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.