Bell v. Employee Security Benefit Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ERISA “clearly preempts all state regulation” of employee benefit plans but the plan there involved was outside the definition
• operation of the plan “provided by a third-party entrepreneur” afforded “profit-making opportunities” for a marketing agency and administrative services provider, who retained “substantial ties” to the organizers of the plan
• operation of the plan \provided by a third-party entrepreneur\ afforded \profit-making opportunities\ for a marketing agency and administrative services provider, who retained \substantial ties\ to the organizers of the plan
• not ERISA plan since insufficient commonality of employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).