Bell v. District of Columbia Government

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “numerous cases” have held that admission into an ARD program is not a conviction that may be used for impeachment
• recognizing that when dealing with statutory mandate, such as section 3731(e)(2), acceptance of ARD is considered a conviction
• holding that the trial court erred by admitting impeachment evidence of a witness’ prior theft arrest, but that the error was harmless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).