Skip to main content
· 12/4/1991

Bell v. Coughlin

Citations

  • 778 F. Supp. 164
  • 1991 WL 242946

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no judicial misconduct where judge disclosed ex parte contact with witness four days after it occurred
  • no basis to disturb trial verdict on the basis of improper ex parte contact, absent some concrete prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lasker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.