Bell v. Brennan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing “vague and conclusory” First Amendment claim involving improperly issued a traffic citation (quoting Rotolo v. Borough of Charleroi, 532 F.2d 920, 922–23 (3d Cir. 1976)) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[m]alicious prosecution generally does not constitute such a [constitutional] deprivation * * * [a]n exception exists where the malicious prosecution is conducted with an intent to deny a person equal protection or which otherwise subjects a person to denial of constitutional rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).