Skip to main content
· 10/21/1924

Bell v. Borders

Citations

  • 205 Ky. 181
  • 265 S.W. 514
  • 1924 Ky. LEXIS 73

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the “relative sophistication of plaintiff’s clients,” who engaged in its services not as “an ‘impulse buy’” but after “some substantial degree of thought and research,” “weighs heavily against finding a likelihood of confusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hobson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.