Skip to main content
· 6/20/2006

Bell v. Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County

Citations

  • 451 F.3d 1097
  • 65 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 240
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15157
  • 88 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,442
  • 2006 WL 1681354

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a fee award of 10% of the lodestar figure which reflects the party’s limited success in the case
  • “If fees are sought in the district court on the basis of a judgment that has been appealed, the court of appeals and district court each have jurisdiction over the distinct matters before them.”
  • “Most circuits recognize that some settlement agreements, even though not explicitly labeled as a ‘consent decree’ may confer ‘prevailing party’ status, if they are sufficiently analogous to a consent decree.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lucero, Ebel, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.