· 6/20/2006
Bell v. Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County
Citations
- 451 F.3d 1097
- 65 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 240
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15157
- 88 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,442
- 2006 WL 1681354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming a fee award of 10% of the lodestar figure which reflects the party’s limited success in the case
- “If fees are sought in the district court on the basis of a judgment that has been appealed, the court of appeals and district court each have jurisdiction over the distinct matters before them.”
- “Most circuits recognize that some settlement agreements, even though not explicitly labeled as a ‘consent decree’ may confer ‘prevailing party’ status, if they are sufficiently analogous to a consent decree.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucero, Ebel, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.