Skip to main content
· 5/9/1983

Bell v. Arel

Citations

  • 123 N.H. 311
  • 461 A.2d 108
  • 1983 N.H. LEXIS 275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the terms of a statute should not be interpreted to lead to an absurd or illogical result
  • proposed ordinance limitations directly counter to statute are invalid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bois

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.