Skip to main content
· 7/20/1967

Bell Intercontinental Corporation v. The United States

Citations

  • 381 F.2d 1004
  • 180 Ct. Cl. 1071
  • 154 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 373
  • 20 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5153
  • 1967 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 17

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the ‘substantial right’ in a patent, the retention of which by the grantor will preclude a sale, ... [is] the right to exclude others from making, using or selling under the patent grant”
  • “so long as [the transferee] lived up to the terms of its agreement, there was no way in which [the transferor] could recapture its patent or even manufacture for its own use without the consent of [the transferee].”
  • “Nor is the question [of whether a transfer is a assignment or a license] governed by the method of payment, and it is, therefore, immaterial that payment is based on a percentage of sales or profits, or on an amount per unit manufactured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cowen, Jones, Laramore, Durfee, Davis, Skelton, Nichols

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.