Bell & Howell Document Management Products Company v. Altek Systems, and Keystone Jackets, Inc. And George Wrabel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that harm to the defendant was not relevant because it had no right to infringe on the plaintiffs patent
• “Patents should be interpreted on the basis of their intrinsic record, not on the testimony of such after-the-fact ‘experts’ that played no part in the creation and prosecution of the patent.”
• “Patents should be interpreted on the basis of their intrinsic record, not on the testimony of such after-the- fact ‘experts’ that played no part in the creation and prosecution of the patent.”
• mutually reinforcing definitions not superfluous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).