Bell ex rel. Fidelity Ins. v. Freeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although plaintiff was not a signatory to the Assistance Agreement, the FHLBB resolutions in the case explicitly recognize plaintiff as a party to the contract
• lack of a “ ‘complete’ contract remedy ... does not give life to a takings theory”
• denying takings remedy for Government’s breach of supervisory merger agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).