Belitz v. Nebraska

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend and noting that plaintiffs can commence a separate action, using facts established in the instant litigation
• analyzing together under Rules 15, 20 and 21 proposed joinder of a defendant
• denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend, finding there is a point in the proceedings when it is not in the interests of judicial economy to join all potential defendants and claims, and noting that plaintiffs could commence a separate action
• “[Although an unjustified delay in bringing the motion may not be reason in itself for denying it, is should be noted that plaintiffs’ delay here was unjustified and serves as an additional factor militating against the motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).