Skip to main content
· 6/15/2005

Belini v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA

Citations

  • 412 F.3d 17
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11256
  • 2005 WL 1399524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that a TILA claim for damages was timely when plaintiffs brought the claim within one year of defendant’s failure to act on plaintiffs’ notice of rescission
  • “The ‘date of the occurrence of the violation,’ here, is at the earliest the [sic] date that [the lender] received the [plaintiffs’] notice of rescission; in truth, the date of the occurrence is likely twenty days later, when [the lender’s] time for responding to that notice expired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Lynch, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.