· 3/2/1992
Belinda Faye Lyle v. Food Lion, Incorporated v. Wayne Tew, Third Party Wayne Tew v. Food Lion, Incorporated
Citations
- 954 F.2d 984
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “it was an abuse of discretion for the district court . . . to forgo the lodestar approach and to calculate reasonable attorney’s fees by adopting instead the attorney’s customary contingent-fee arrangement”
- concluding that “it was an abuse of discretion for the district court . . . to forgo the lodestar approach and to calculate reasonable attorney’s fees by adopting instead the attorney’s customary contingent-fee arrangement”
- finding that the FLSA “simply will not allow” an indemnity claim by an employer against an employee
- finding that the risk of counsel not being compensated in a case taken on a contingent 10 fee basis, standing alone, was not a sufficient ground for enhancing the lodestar fee
- affirming dismissal of an employer's counterclaim and third-party complaint for indemnity against the plaintiff for the plaintiff's FLSA claims
- affirming dismissal of an employer’s counterclaim and third-party complaint for indemnity against the plaintiff for the plaintiff’s FLSA claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Phillips, Wilkins, Ward, Middle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.