Skip to main content
· 3/2/1992

Belinda Faye Lyle v. Food Lion, Incorporated v. Wayne Tew, Third Party Wayne Tew v. Food Lion, Incorporated

Citations

  • 954 F.2d 984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “it was an abuse of discretion for the district court . . . to forgo the lodestar approach and to calculate reasonable attorney’s fees by adopting instead the attorney’s customary contingent-fee arrangement”
  • concluding that “it was an abuse of discretion for the district court . . . to forgo the lodestar approach and to calculate reasonable attorney’s fees by adopting instead the attorney’s customary contingent-fee arrangement”
  • finding that the FLSA “simply will not allow” an indemnity claim by an employer against an employee
  • finding that the risk of counsel not being compensated in a case taken on a contingent 10 fee basis, standing alone, was not a sufficient ground for enhancing the lodestar fee
  • affirming dismissal of an employer's counterclaim and third-party complaint for indemnity against the plaintiff for the plaintiff's FLSA claims
  • affirming dismissal of an employer’s counterclaim and third-party complaint for indemnity against the plaintiff for the plaintiff’s FLSA claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillips, Wilkins, Ward, Middle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.