Belica v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• notwithstanding policy of courts to be solicitous of rights of self-represented parties, Superior Court lacked authority to consider self- represented plaintiff’s challenge of board’s findings when plaintiff failed to file motion to correct pursuant to Practice Book § 22-4
• plaintiffs failure to file motion to correct board’s findings fatal to his contrary factual claims on appeal
• failure to file timely motion for correction of board’s findings in accordance with Practice Book § 22-4 prevents further review of facts found by board
• failure to file timely motion for correction of board’s findings in accordance with Practice Book § 22- 4 prevents further review of facts found by board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).