· 7/6/1976
Belen v. Woodbridge Tp. Bd. of Ed.
Citations
- 362 A.2d 47
- 142 N.J. Super. 486
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the DFR “has received extensive development in the experience and adjudications under the [NLRA], which we find to be an appropriate guide for the interpretation of our own enactment”
- dismissing the DFR claim on the merits
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Lynch, Larner and Horn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.