Skip to main content
· 7/6/1976

Belen v. Woodbridge Tp. Bd. of Ed.

Citations

  • 362 A.2d 47
  • 142 N.J. Super. 486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the DFR “has received extensive development in the experience and adjudications under the [NLRA], which we find to be an appropriate guide for the interpretation of our own enactment”
  • dismissing the DFR claim on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Lynch, Larner and Horn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.