Skip to main content
· 1/5/1905

Belding v. Washington Cornice Co.

Citations

  • 36 Wash. 549
  • 79 P. 37
  • 1905 Wash. LEXIS 626

Syllabus

<p>Appeal and Error — Review—Demurrer to Complaint — Appeal prom Appointment op Receiver. Upon an appeal from an order appointing a temporary receiver, an order made at the time of the appointment, overruling a demurrer to the complaint, can not he urged as error where the complaint is not so defective as to be incapable of amendment, since it is not a final order and is reviewable only on appeal from a final judgment.</p> <p>Receivers — Appointment—Sufficiency op Showing. Under the rule of this court to appoint a receiver only where it is necessary to prevent the property from being wasted or lost, it is error to appoint a receiver of a corporation, at the suit of one claiming to hold the majority of the stock, and whom the officers refused to recognize as a stockholder, where the proofs consisted of affidavits showing a dispute as to the rightful ownership of the stock.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.