Skip to main content
· 6/30/1980

Belcher v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company

Citations

  • 293 N.W.2d 594
  • 409 Mich. 231
  • 1980 Mich. LEXIS 236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 3114 is both a priority and an entitlement provision
  • “[A] survivor’s entitlement to benefits may be said to be derivative of or dependent upon the deceased injured person’s entitlement to benefits had he survived.”
  • “[B]efore recovery of benefits may be obtained through an assigned claims plan, it must be determined that no personal protection insurance is ‘applicable to the injury.’ ”
  • “[I]t is necessary to infer from the language of [MCL 500.3114 and MCL 500.3115] that where an injured person is given the right to recover benefits from a specific insurer, his surviving dependents have the same right of recovery for their losses.”
  • “[I]t is necessary to infer from the language of [MCL 500.3114 and MCL 500.3115] that where an injured person is given the right to recover benefits from a specific insurer, his surviving dependents have the same right of recovery for their losses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman, Kavanagh, Williams, Levin, Fitzgerald, Ryan, Moody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.