Belcher Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Hospira, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that we held in DuPuy that “‘a direct physical invasion’ is not required under section 17, article I, of the Texas Constitution by reason of the addition to the Constitution of 1876 of the words ‘damaged or destroyed’”
• stating that we held in DuPuy that “‘a direct physical invasion’ is not required under section 17, article I, of the Texas Constitution by reason of the addition to the Constitution of 1876 of the words ‘damaged or destroyed’”
• explaining that “[e]very government has the power to construct or to cause to be constructed public works, and in so far as such construction works an injury to the public, it can give no one a right to a private action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).